Re: Inflate a boolean

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/21]

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?=
Subject: Re: Inflate a boolean
Date: 21:25 on 21 Feb 2005

On Feb 20, 2005, at 2:24 PM, Ofer Nave wrote:

> 2) Accessor overrides are even more generic, since you can do pretty 
> much whatever you want, and it only requires defining a single 
> function (not a class).  However, it does it's thing every time a 
> value is accessed, which is inefficient if you can accomplish your 
> goal by converting once upon load.

If the efficiency of that is a concern then you might not be using the 
right tool for the job in the first place.  :-)

  - ask

        -- 
        http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/

(message missing)

Inflate a boolean
adtim 09:08 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 09:22 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 09:44 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
a.d.tim 10:35 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 11:15 on 20 Feb 2005

Re[2]: Inflate a boolean
a.d.tim 12:37 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Perrin Harkins 21:15 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 21:40 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 22:07 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Ofer Nave 22:24 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Johan Lindstrom 22:47 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 23:35 on 20 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Johan Lindstrom 00:20 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
Tony Bowden 09:31 on 21 Feb 2005

Re: Inflate a boolean
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 21:25 on 21 Feb 2005