Re: CDBI::Factory apache2

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/05]

From: William Ross
Subject: Re: CDBI::Factory apache2
Date: 20:53 on 05 Apr 2005
On 5 Apr 2005, at 21:33, toddrw69@xxxxxx.xxx wrote:

>> Why do recent versions of CDBI::Factory require apache2? I've not
>> made the migration. I might be interested in C::F but not ready to
>> make the move over to apache2 as I have stuff setup for 1.3.x and
>> it works ok for now.
>
> I emailed the CDF author with a question and mentioned that I am using 
> an old version so I can use MP1 and here was his comment:
>
>> when CDF gets to version 1, it will probably come with Handler1 and
>> Handler2 classes: only the handler requires mod_perl2. That should > 
>> be some time early next week, with any luck.

hah. same story now, just a different week.

CDF doesn't insist on Apache 1 or 2 when you install it or use it in 
simple ways. It only becomes an issue if you want to use the handler 
base class that comes with it. The documentation needs to be clearer on 
that point, I think.

Used by itself CDF is just a quick way of bundling classes together 
that makes very few assumptions about how things should be done. Used 
with its Handlers, Exceptions and other supporting machinery it becomes 
sort of instant mod_perl application - just add data - and consequently 
has far more entailments and makes many more assumptions. As always, 
its usefulness to you will depend on how closely those assumptions 
match your own.

best

will

CDBI::Factory apache2
Dana Hudes 20:05 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: CDBI::Factory apache2
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 20:31 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: CDBI::Factory apache2
Dana Hudes 20:34 on 05 Apr 2005

RE: CDBI::Factory apache2
"toddrw69 20:33 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: CDBI::Factory apache2
William Ross 20:53 on 05 Apr 2005

Generated at 14:42 on 11 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52