Re: ORM comparison suggestion (was Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2006/03/01]

From: Tim Bunce
Subject: Re: ORM comparison suggestion (was Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class)
Date: 09:59 on 01 Mar 2006
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 12:56:27AM -0600, Peter Speltz wrote:
> On 2/28/06, Matt S Trout <dbix-class@xxxxx.xx.xx> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 01:20:34PM +0000, William Ross wrote:
> 
> > Sounds like fun, except suddenly it's a web framework competition as well.
> > Which somewhat misses the point.
> 
> I dont think so. How a framework uses / can use an ORM is quite
> relevant. Is there a good bit of code written for you already -- a
> nifty base class for your ORM ?  How can you use your ORM with this
> framework?  In Maypole, if you dont want to use a Class::DBI type ORM 
> you have some work to do before you can use Maypole.  So i say what
> frameworks do with ORMs is relevant to ORM comparison.  Could be the
> most relevant thing for me actually as when it comes down to it, most
> or a good deal of my code is on the ORM level it seems.

I see it as a relevant but separate issue.

I'd like to see a comparison of ORM modules that is independent of what
software is typically layered on top.

How easily/well certain web frameworks can use certain ORMs (or how
closely tied they are) is certainly important information, but secondary.
It belongs in an appendix.

Tim.

_______________________________________________
ClassDBI mailing list
ClassDBI@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
http://lists.digitalcraftsmen.net/mailman/listinfo/classdbi

(message missing)

[CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
David Lloyd 00:29 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 01:18 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 10:04 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 00:15 on 28 Feb 2006

Old announce thread
Matt S Trout 15:29 on 28 Feb 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Brad Bowman 11:07 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
yoorobot 15:14 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 16:15 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Christopher H. Laco 16:10 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Perrin Harkins 16:42 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Ryan Tate 18:30 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 01:27 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 18:40 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Perrin Harkins 18:44 on 17 Jan 2006

RE: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Dmitri Bichko 16:22 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
John Siracusa 16:43 on 18 Jan 2006

RE: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Dmitri Bichko 17:49 on 18 Jan 2006

RE: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Perrin Harkins 18:03 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
John Siracusa 18:05 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
John Siracusa 18:06 on 18 Jan 2006

RE: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Dmitri Bichko 18:20 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: ORM comparison suggestion (was Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class)
Tim Bunce 09:59 on 01 Mar 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 19:00 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Simon Wilcox 19:16 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Perrin Harkins 20:30 on 17 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 00:56 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
John Siracusa 01:12 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 11:36 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
John Siracusa 12:37 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Matt S Trout 01:21 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 11:37 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Tim Bunce 23:43 on 18 Jan 2006

Re: [CDBI] Class::DBI vs DBIx::Class
Ryan Tate 23:57 on 18 Jan 2006

Generated at 20:44 on 01 Mar 2006 by mariachi v0.52