Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/27]

From: Eric
Subject: Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Date: 00:17 on 27 Nov 2004
All I ask is that you kill that center tag on your site :)

I have an aborted project that had been intended to use XML-RPC with PHP 
being the client, and mod_perl being the server. I am interested in what 
you are doing, but I am wondering how much use it is for this kind of 
project if it is not following some standard. On that I am not certain 
because I know Flash does use XML of some kind, but what about other 
systems, languages? Would I end up having to write a custom client in PHP 
in order to use this in place of XML-RPC which comes built in to PHP now days?

I also think it is pretty cool that you have some enthusiasm over your own 
work, nothing wrong with that!

Thanks,

Eric

At 03:57 PM 11/26/2004, you wrote:
>Gentlemen,
>
>mod_perlservice rocks. I know because I wrote it.
>
>Let my email explain why I wrote mod_perlservice and why it will provide
>obvious benefits to webservices developers.
>
>Why not just use XML-RPC?
>
>XML-RPC is a standalone system (except for the Java-Apache extension). If
>you need to run your webservices system on port 80, for firewalling issues
>for instance, you can't also run Apache. That's not ideal. With
>mod_perlservice, you can host RPC webservices AND webpages all on one
>server! Wow.
>
>mod_perlservice was built to intentionally take advantage of both object
>oriented and function oriented programming styles. I'm not sure whether
>XML-RPC was designed with that in mind.
>
>Also mod_perlservice's configuration system allows you to host MANY RPC
>applications on a single Apache server. Try hosting 25 different remote
>apps using XML-RPC; there is no native functionality that enables XML-RPC
>to accomplish such feats.
>
>Furthermore, mod_perlservice offers a clean programming interface, much
>cleaner, less complicated, more scalable, and better organized than any
>system out there. Just try it.
>
>Furtherstill, mod_perlservice builds on Apache, the most secure, trusted
>and stable platform out there. But I don't need to tell you the benefits
>of that. It's why you have mod_perl instead of a standalone Perl-CGI
>webserver.
>
>Well, why not just use mod_perl?
>
>Well that's a silly question. mod_perlservice is an RPC system, not a CGI
>system. You will NOT use mod_perlservice to serve up dynamic web pages -
>that's mod_perl's job. No, mod_perlservice will be used to create
>applications that need to call remote subs and object-methods. mod_perl
>CGI doesn't provide support for marshaling and unmarshaling aggregates;
>try passing an array of hashes of arrays of integers efficiently using
>CGI, it's improbable. mod_perlservice is for distributed applications that
>need to pass and retrieve complex data structures, it is not for simple
>forms and content-based html apps.
>
>So, I've been a bit of a Frankenstein, sewing mod_perlservice together
>from the best elements of all the systems out there. Now we have a
>scalable, secure, practical, clean, fast, and robust webservices system.
>Be happy.
>
>It's all Free and GPL. It was developed by me and I decided to share it
>with all of you. I don't understand why some of you might snark at my
>work. If you'd ever launched a GPL project of your own, I believe you'd
>stop short of criticizing before you know the whole story. I've spent
>hundreds of hours contributing something useful to the community that I've
>received so much from. Every submission should be welcomed.
>
>On the other hand I understand the emotion. You may have felt threatened
>by a new embedded perl system on Apache. I hope I have allayed your fears
>since mod_perlservice doesn't threaten your work, but instead complements
>it.
>
>I wrote mod_perlservice because there was nothing out there that satisfied
>my requirements. It has saved me hundreds of hours while developing my own
>applications. I hope it will save you time and effort too. I would be
>happy to answer any other questions you may have, and hope you give
>mod_perlservice a warm welcome into the GPL world.
>
>Thank You.
>
>Michael Collins
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
>Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
>List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html


Lead Programmer
D.M. Contact Management
250.383.8267 ext 229 


        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
michaelcollins 23:57 on 26 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Eric 00:17 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Sam Tregar 04:24 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Dan Brian 06:06 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Perrin Harkins 04:54 on 30 Nov 2004

mod_perl marketing
Dominique Quatravaux 10:41 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 14:29 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 14:51 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Kurt Hansen 15:21 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 15:33 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 15:48 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Dan Brian 16:10 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Xavier Noria 15:42 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 15:52 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Goehring, Chuck, RCI - San Diego 17:10 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 16:25 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 17:05 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Kurt Hansen 18:47 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:14 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 20:07 on 30 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:26 on 21 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52