Re: mod_perl marketing

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/11/30]

From: Geoffrey Young
Subject: Re: mod_perl marketing
Date: 14:51 on 30 Nov 2004
> During those projects,
> the only place where I saw it clearly stated that mod_perl is "program
> Apache the way you like in Perl" instead of "CGI on steroids" is the
> Eagle Book - which for the record, is an O'Reilly book titled "Writing
> Apache Modules in Perl and C" by Lincoln Stein and Doug McEachern, and
> the name "Eagle Book" comes from the fact that the cover animal is,
> you guessed it, an eagle
> (http://www.foo.be/docs/tpj/issues/vol4_3/tpj0403-0014.html). Even
> *that* bibliographic data was a pain for me to retrieve from the
> mailing list archive!
> 
> Online documentation on anything in the mod_perl guts is very, very
> scarce, and I had to RTFS more than once even to perform basic
> mod_perlish tasks such as writing a subclass of Apache::RegistryNG.
> Even the Eagle Book itself is sub-useful in places (e.g. the infamous
> ass_backwards stuff), and other parts of the Apache API visible from
> mod_perl has to be guessed from the "writing Apache modules in [...]
> C" section. At least this is how things were two years ago: 

I feel I need to interject here.  _all_ of the points you raise to this
point are well covered in the mod_perl developer's cookbook, which has been
available since  02/2001.  in fact, that's why we wrote it - both to address
many of the things the mod_perl community had learned since the eagle book
was written, as well as take the "access to the C API in Perl" road.  we
hardly even mention Registry or CGI (but we do mention how to subclass
RegistryNG :) and that was very, very on purpose.

the unfortunate situation is that the cookbook suffers from lack of exposure
(and sales, for that matter) - you obviously understand mod_perl and are
participating on the list, yet you still didn't know that your issues are
(and were) well covered with available documentation.

anyway, at this point, that we wrote a book that nobody seems to be using is
less of a complaint than a simple fact of life, so I guess it doesn't make
sense to discuss it further.  just venting a bit...

--Geoff

        -- 
        Report problems: http://perl.apache.org/bugs/
Mail list info: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/modperl.html
List etiquette: http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html

(message missing)

mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
michaelcollins 23:57 on 26 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Eric 00:17 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Sam Tregar 04:24 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Dan Brian 06:06 on 27 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Perrin Harkins 04:54 on 30 Nov 2004

mod_perl marketing
Dominique Quatravaux 10:41 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 14:29 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 14:51 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Kurt Hansen 15:21 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 15:33 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Geoffrey Young 15:48 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Dan Brian 16:10 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Xavier Noria 15:42 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 15:52 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perlservice? Heck Yeah!
Goehring, Chuck, RCI - San Diego 17:10 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Frank Wiles 16:25 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 17:05 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Kurt Hansen 18:47 on 30 Nov 2004

RE: mod_perl marketing
Clayton Cottingham 19:14 on 30 Nov 2004

Re: mod_perl marketing
Perrin Harkins 20:07 on 30 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:26 on 21 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52