Re: APR::Date

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/17]

From: Joe Schaefer
Subject: Re: APR::Date
Date: 04:12 on 17 Mar 2005
Malcolm J Harwood <mjhlist-modperl@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> writes:

[...]

> The current doc says:
> 	# parse RFC822-complient date string
>
> Which it doesn't (as RFC822 includes multiple timezones).

Which is *exactly* why I recommended the docs include a pointer to 
aprutil.  All modperl does it wrap the C function; it provides
no guarantees about the behavior itself (other than what's in 
the test suite), so it doesn't surprise me that there's an error
in the wrapper documentation.

[...]

> How about simply correcting the parse_http docs from:
> 	The date string can be in one of the following formats:
> to:
> 	The date string can be in one of the following formats (as per RFC2616):
>
> That way anyone interested can look up the correct RFC if they want the gory 
> details.

The RFC is a guideline, not the final arbiter.  This link is exactly
what you are looking for:

    http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/group___a_p_r___util___date.html#ga1


        -- 
        Joe Schaefer

(message missing)

APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 21:00 on 14 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 00:02 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:26 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 02:30 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 03:19 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 03:37 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 03:55 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 04:12 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 01:16 on 18 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:54 on 18 Mar 2005

Generated at 11:30 on 21 Mar 2005 by mariachi v0.52