Re: APR::Date

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/18]

From: Malcolm J Harwood
Subject: Re: APR::Date
Date: 01:16 on 18 Mar 2005
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 11:12 pm, Joe Schaefer wrote:

> > How about simply correcting the parse_http docs from:
> > 	The date string can be in one of the following formats:
> > to:
> > 	The date string can be in one of the following formats (as per RFC2616):
> >
> > That way anyone interested can look up the correct RFC if they want the
> > gory details.
> The RFC is a guideline, not the final arbiter.  This link is exactly
> what you are looking for:

> http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/group___a_p_r___util___date.html#ga1

Except that link mirrors the current mod_perl documentation, and doesn't 
mention  RFC 2616 (and the GMT-only requirement) either. So if the mod_perl 
doc is incorrect (or at least incomplete) so is that.

(message missing)

APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 21:00 on 14 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 00:02 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:26 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 02:30 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 03:19 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 03:37 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 03:55 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 04:12 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 01:16 on 18 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:54 on 18 Mar 2005

Generated at 11:30 on 21 Mar 2005 by mariachi v0.52