Re: APR::Date

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/18]

From: Joe Schaefer
Subject: Re: APR::Date
Date: 01:54 on 18 Mar 2005

Malcolm J Harwood <mjhlist-modperl@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx> writes:

> On Wednesday 16 March 2005 11:12 pm, Joe Schaefer wrote:

[...]

>> The RFC is a guideline, not the final arbiter.  This link is exactly
>> what you are looking for:
>
>> http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr-util/group___a_p_r___util___date.html#ga1
>
> Except that link mirrors the current mod_perl documentation, and
> doesn't mention  RFC 2616 (and the GMT-only requirement) either. So
> if the mod_perl doc is incorrect (or at least incomplete) so is that.

Exactly, by having a reference to libaprutil in our docs,
you now know where to send your documentation patch so 
it'll be of maximum benefit.

        -- 
        Joe Schaefer

(message missing)

APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 21:00 on 14 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 00:02 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:26 on 15 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 02:30 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 03:19 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Stas Bekman 03:37 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 03:55 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 04:12 on 17 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Malcolm J Harwood 01:16 on 18 Mar 2005

Re: APR::Date
Joe Schaefer 01:54 on 18 Mar 2005