Is mod_perl installed
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/05/19]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CA3.6CEF5A29
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Stas,
=20
I know this has been asked a ton of time and I have read everything on =
the site to check if MP is installed - my problem now is I have a client =
who has told me over and over again that mod_perl is installed - every =
method documented on the site says it is not (string doesn't appear in =
the error log, via telnet to apache or via the lwp-request method, it =
also doesn't appear via httpd -l.
All method above report only "Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) configured"
=20
The box is RH enterprise and Apache and MP2 were installed via RPM - the =
client called RH (to prove me wrong) and RH told him if you installed =
MP2 via the RH RPM then that MP2 line shouldn't appear anyplace...
=20
I find that really hard to believe BEFORE I wasn't able find anything =
documented about it.. Is that true?
=20
So I guess my question is, can it be said with 100% certainty that the =
"mod_perl 1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log (or those other =
documented methods) if its installed and configured properly?
=20
Is there any other ways to prove its installed or not installed?
=20
Thanks
-Chris
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CA3.6CEF5A29
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"><HTML =
DIR=3Dltr><HEAD><META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1"></HEAD><BODY><DIV><FONT face=3D'Arial' =
color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Hey Stas,</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I know this has been asked a ton of =
time and I have =0A=
read everything on the site to check if MP is installed - my problem now =
is I =0A=
have a client who has told me over and over again that mod_perl is =
installed - =0A=
every method documented on the site says it is not (string doesn't =
appear in the =0A=
error log, via telnet to apache or via the lwp-request method, it also =
doesn't =0A=
appear via httpd -l.</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>All method above report only =
"Apache/2.0.46 (Red =0A=
Hat) configured"</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The box is RH enterprise and Apache and =
MP2 were =0A=
installed via RPM - the client called RH (to prove me wrong) and RH =
told =0A=
him if you installed MP2 via the RH RPM then that MP2 line shouldn't =
appear =0A=
anyplace...</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I find that really hard to believe =
BEFORE I wasn't =0A=
able find anything documented about it.. Is that true?</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So I guess my question is, can it be =
said with 100% =0A=
certainty that the "mod_perl 1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log =
(or those =0A=
other documented methods) if its installed and configured =
properly?</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Is there any other ways to prove its =
installed or =0A=
not installed?</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-Chris</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CA3.6CEF5A29--
 |
Is mod_perl installed
cfaust-dougot 18:49 on 19 May 2005
|
