RE: Is mod_perl installed
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/05/20]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55D22.8988CEE7
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Perrin, that makes more sense.
Although I agree the RPM is ancient, I've been telling them that the =
real problem is they installed from RPM and now think nothing could =
possibly be wrong as the RPM installed without an error :)..
=20
-Chris
=20
=20
________________________________
From: Perrin Harkins [mailto:perrin@xxxxxxxxx.xxx]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 5:06 PM
To: modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: Is mod_perl installed
On Thursday 19 May 2005 2:49 pm, cfaust-dougot wrote:
> The box is RH enterprise and Apache and MP2 were installed via RPM
Well, you know that's going to be a problem, right? That RPM is ancient =
and
that version of mod_perl is no longer supported.
> So I guess my question is, can it be said with 100% certainty that the
> "mod_perl 1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log (or those other
> documented methods) if its installed and configured properly?
It's always possible to change things in the source, but it seems very
unlikely they would have done this for the error log message. More =
likely it
is installed but not configured to actually be loaded when the server =
starts
up.
- Perrin
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55D22.8988CEE7
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">=0A=
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">=0A=
<HTML>=0A=
<HEAD>=0A=
=0A=
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7226.0">=0A=
<TITLE>Re: Is mod_perl installed</TITLE>=0A=
</HEAD>=0A=
<BODY>=0A=
<DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText31957 dir=3Dltr>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Thanks =
Perrin, that makes =0A=
more sense.</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Although I agree the RPM is =
ancient, I've =0A=
been telling them that the real problem is they installed from RPM and =
now think =0A=
nothing could possibly be wrong as the RPM installed without an error =0A=
:)..</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-Chris</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr>=0A=
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>=0A=
</DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Perrin Harkins =0A=
[mailto:perrin@xxxxxxxxx.xxx]<BR><B>Sent:</B>; Thu 5/19/2005 5:06 =0A=
PM<BR><B>To:</B> modperl@xxxx.xxxxxx.xxx<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Is =
mod_perl =0A=
installed<BR></FONT><BR></DIV></DIV>=0A=
<DIV>=0A=
<P><FONT size=3D2>On Thursday 19 May 2005 2:49 pm, cfaust-dougot =
wrote:<BR>> =0A=
The box is RH enterprise and Apache and MP2 were installed via =
RPM<BR><BR>Well, =0A=
you know that's going to be a problem, right? That RPM is ancient =0A=
and<BR>that version of mod_perl is no longer supported.<BR><BR>> So I =
guess =0A=
my question is, can it be said with 100% certainty that the<BR>> =
"mod_perl =0A=
1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log (or those other<BR>> =
documented =0A=
methods) if its installed and configured properly?<BR><BR>It's always =
possible =0A=
to change things in the source, but it seems very<BR>unlikely they would =
have =0A=
done this for the error log message. More likely it<BR>is =
installed but =0A=
not configured to actually be loaded when the server =
starts<BR>up.<BR><BR>- =0A=
Perrin<BR></FONT></P></DIV>=0A=
=0A=
</BODY>=0A=
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55D22.8988CEE7--
 |
 |
RE: Is mod_perl installed
cfaust-dougot 09:58 on 20 May 2005
|
