RE: Is mod_perl installed
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/05/19]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CBA.93557209
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Jay,
=20
Yes, all that is true.. the perl.conf is pulled into the httpd.conf and =
the first line is loading the mod_perl.so and the file does exist in the =
modules directory..
=20
So by that your saying that mp2 is OK even though it doesn't appear any =
of those methods to check if its installed or not? I wouldn't think the =
existence of the conf and so file would be enough to say everything was =
correct.
=20
Thanks
-Chris
________________________________
From: Jay Scherrer [mailto:jay@xxxxxxxx.xxx]
Sent: Thu 5/19/2005 5:17 PM
To: cfaust-dougot
Cc: mod_perl
Subject: Re: Is mod_perl installed
Cfaust,
What does your httpd.conf file say after the modules listing?
If it says something like:
#
#load configfiles from the config directory "/etc/httpd.conf.d"
#
Include conf.d/*.conf
#
Then check there for your: perl.conf file.
Within the perl.conf file you will find:
LoadModule perl_module modules/mod_perl.so
Then look for the perl_module in /etc/httpd/modules.
This is standard placement for Redhat Linux RPMs.
I have found that I can edit this perl.conf to customize my modPerl and
directories and script aliases
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 14:49 -0400, cfaust-dougot wrote:
> Hey Stas,
>=20
> I know this has been asked a ton of time and I have read everything on
> the site to check if MP is installed - my problem now is I have a
> client who has told me over and over again that mod_perl is installed
> - every method documented on the site says it is not (string doesn't
> appear in the error log, via telnet to apache or via the lwp-request
> method, it also doesn't appear via httpd -l.
> All method above report only "Apache/2.0.46 (Red Hat) configured"
>=20
> The box is RH enterprise and Apache and MP2 were installed via RPM -
> the client called RH (to prove me wrong) and RH told him if you
> installed MP2 via the RH RPM then that MP2 line shouldn't appear
> anyplace...
>=20
> I find that really hard to believe BEFORE I wasn't able find anything
> documented about it.. Is that true?
>=20
> So I guess my question is, can it be said with 100% certainty that the
> "mod_perl 1.99xxxx" should show up in the error log (or those other
> documented methods) if its installed and configured properly?
>=20
> Is there any other ways to prove its installed or not installed?
>=20
> Thanks
> -Chris
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CBA.93557209
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">=0A=
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">=0A=
<HTML>=0A=
<HEAD>=0A=
=0A=
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7226.0">=0A=
<TITLE>Re: Is mod_perl installed</TITLE>=0A=
</HEAD>=0A=
<BODY>=0A=
<DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText41094 dir=3Dltr>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Hey =
Jay,</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Yes, all that is true.. the =
perl.conf is =0A=
pulled into the httpd.conf and the first line is loading the mod_perl.so =
and the =0A=
file does exist in the modules directory..</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>So by that your saying that =
mp2 is OK even =0A=
though it doesn't appear any of those methods to check if its installed =
or not? =0A=
I wouldn't think the existence of the conf and so file would be enough =
to say =0A=
everything was correct.</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Thanks</FONT></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>-Chris</FONT></DIV></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><BR>=0A=
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>=0A=
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Jay Scherrer =0A=
[mailto:jay@xxxxxxxx.xxx]<BR><B>Sent:</B>; Thu 5/19/2005 5:17 =
PM<BR><B>To:</B> =0A=
cfaust-dougot<BR><B>Cc:</B> mod_perl<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: Is mod_perl =0A=
installed<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>=0A=
<DIV>=0A=
<P><FONT size=3D2>Cfaust,<BR><BR>What does your httpd.conf file say =
after the =0A=
modules listing?<BR>If it says something like:<BR>#<BR>#load configfiles =
from =0A=
the config directory "/etc/httpd.conf.d"<BR>#<BR>Include =0A=
conf.d/*.conf<BR>#<BR>Then check there for your: perl.conf =
file.<BR>Within the =0A=
perl.conf file you will find:<BR>LoadModule perl_module =0A=
modules/mod_perl.so<BR><BR>Then look for the perl_module in =0A=
/etc/httpd/modules.<BR><BR>This is standard placement for Redhat Linux =0A=
RPMs.<BR>I have found that I can edit this perl.conf to customize my =
modPerl =0A=
and<BR>directories and script aliases<BR><BR>On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 14:49 =
-0400, =0A=
cfaust-dougot wrote:<BR>> Hey Stas,<BR>> <BR>> I know this =
has =0A=
been asked a ton of time and I have read everything on<BR>> the site =
to check =0A=
if MP is installed - my problem now is I have a<BR>> client who has =
told me =0A=
over and over again that mod_perl is installed<BR>> - every method =
documented =0A=
on the site says it is not (string doesn't<BR>> appear in the error =
log, via =0A=
telnet to apache or via the lwp-request<BR>> method, it also doesn't =
appear =0A=
via httpd -l.<BR>> All method above report only "Apache/2.0.46 (Red =
Hat) =0A=
configured"<BR>> <BR>> The box is RH enterprise and Apache =
and MP2 =0A=
were installed via RPM -<BR>> the client called RH (to prove me =
wrong) and RH =0A=
told him if you<BR>> installed MP2 via the RH RPM then that MP2 line =0A=
shouldn't appear<BR>> anyplace...<BR>> <BR>> I find that =
really =0A=
hard to believe BEFORE I wasn't able find anything<BR>> documented =
about it.. =0A=
Is that true?<BR>> <BR>> So I guess my question is, can it be =
said =0A=
with 100% certainty that the<BR>> "mod_perl 1.99xxxx" should show up =
in the =0A=
error log (or those other<BR>> documented methods) if its installed =
and =0A=
configured properly?<BR>> <BR>> Is there any other ways to =
prove its =0A=
installed or not installed?<BR>> <BR>> Thanks<BR>> =0A=
-Chris<BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV>=0A=
=0A=
</BODY>=0A=
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C55CBA.93557209--
 |
 |
RE: Is mod_perl installed
cfaust-dougot 21:29 on 19 May 2005
|
