Re: SER1 1954 86" Series I with SII /109" front axle.
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2004/09/08]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090803020906090904030707
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
G'Day Jamie,
Do not mix your brake components. Best idea would be to obtain a
pair of series II SWB brake backing plates drums and wheel cylinders and
fit them onto the your axle. The diameter of Series II and IIA SWB wheel
cylinders front and rear is the same as Series I.
Note also that the Series II front axle has a 2" (51mm) wider track
than the 86" semi floating rear axle. This combination, whilst it would
probably work OK will look odd and may be illegal in many countries
(certainly is here).
Cheers
Allan
Canberra, Australia
Jaime Campos wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am restoring a 1954 86" SI and I've seen that it has a SII 109 front
> axle and need some advice about it.
> Is there any problem having different size axles: front 109, rear
> semi-floating 86?
> If there is no problem, will the the 86 master cylinder be OK using
> 11" brake drums? or is it better to use a 107/109 master cylinder?
>
>
> Many thanks
>
> Jaume Campos
> Barcelona (SPAIN)
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> <http://es.rd.yahoo.com/mail_es/tagline/mail/image/*http://es.mail.yahoo.com>;
>
>
--------------090803020906090904030707
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
G'Day Jamie,<br>
Do not mix your brake components. Best idea would be to obtain a
pair of series II SWB brake backing plates drums and wheel cylinders
and fit them onto the your axle. The diameter of Series II and IIA SWB
wheel cylinders front and rear is the same as Series I.<br>
Note also that the Series II front axle has a 2" (51mm) wider track
than the 86" semi floating rear axle. This combination, whilst it would
probably work OK will look odd and may be illegal in many countries
(certainly is here).<br>
Cheers<br>
Allan<br>
Canberra, Australia<br>
<br>
Jaime Campos wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid20040908133902.39459.qmail@xxxxxxxx.xxxx.xxxxx.xxx">
<div>
<table width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td dir="ltr">
<p><font face="PrimaSans BT,Verdana,sans-serif">Hi all,<br>
I am restoring a 1954 86" SI and I've seen that it has a SII 109 front
axle and need some advice about it.<br>
Is there any problem having different size axles: front 109, rear
semi-floating 86?<br>
If there is no problem, will the the 86 master cylinder be OK using 11"
brake drums? or is it better to use a 107/109 master cylinder? </font></p>
<p><font face="PrimaSans BT,Verdana,sans-serif"><br>
Many thanks<br>
<br>
Jaume Campos<br>
Barcelona (SPAIN)<br>
</font></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p> </p>
<hr size="1"><br>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a
href="http://es.rd.yahoo.com/mail_es/tagline/mail/image/*http://es.mail.yahoo.com"><img
src="http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/i/es/mail/mails.gif";
height="80" width="230" alt="Nuevo Correo Yahoo!" border="0"
align="left" moz-do-not-send="true"></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------090803020906090904030707--
To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
 |
 |
Re: SER1 1954 86" Series I with SII /109" front axle.
Allan Harding 22:31 on 08 Sep 2004
|
![http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/i/es/mail/mails.gif"](http://eur.i1.yimg.com/eur.yimg.com/i/es/mail/mails.gif"){kind=link}
