Re: SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/12/18]
From: Matthew J. Clark
Subject: Re: SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
Date: 04:02 on 18 Dec 2004
Subject: Re: SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
Date: 04:02 on 18 Dec 2004
> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3186158571_1733136 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Tom- I=B9ve never heard of the RHD Illegalness in the US. What=B9s the scoop with that? There are plenty of Brit cars and trucks up here in the NW that are RHD. Doesn=B9t seem to be an issue with =B3the man=B2 here. Fill me in on the details. Matthew Clark Seattle, WA 1957 107=B2 SW On 12/17/04 7:45 PM, "TBache9248@xxx.xxx" <TBache9248@xxx.xxx> wrote: > HI, > To follow up on Tom W.s comments, probably a few of us in the US would li= ke to > have the complete Rover! > Oddly enough, we are about to convert Jeff's 109 PU to RHD as that is the > chassis he has. Not a job for the faint of heart. We are lucky not to hav= e > meddling rules forbiding RHD cars in this country, This would be frustrat= ing > to find out you have spent loads getting the vehicle ready and not permit= ted > to drive it. As yours is an 80", the RHD bits will be easy to source in = the > UK. Shipping might be a headache. > I know this sounds a bit far out, but any shot at finding a RHD chassis t= o use > for a restructured vehicle? Africa right? I know it is a big place, clu= b > contacts might be a possible source. > =20 > Tom Bache > Avondale, PA > USA >=20 --B_3186158571_1733136 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Re: SER1 Re: LHD to RHD</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> <FONT FACE=3D"Helvetica">Tom-<BR> <BR> I’ve never heard of the RHD Illegalness in the US. What’s= the scoop with that? There are plenty of Brit cars and trucks up here= in the NW that are RHD. Doesn’t seem to be an issue with “= ;the man” here. Fill me in on the details.<BR> <BR> Matthew Clark<BR> Seattle, WA<BR> 1957 107” SW<BR> <BR> On 12/17/04 7:45 PM, "TBache9248@xxx.xxx" <TBache9248@xxx.xxx&= gt; wrote:<BR> <BR> </FONT><BLOCKQUOTE><FONT SIZE=3D"2"><FONT FACE=3D"Arial">HI,<BR> To follow up on Tom W.s comments, probably a few of us in the US would like= to have the complete Rover!<BR> Oddly enough, we are about to convert Jeff's 109 PU to RHD as that is the c= hassis he has. Not a job for the faint of heart. We are lucky not to have me= ddling rules forbiding RHD cars in this country, This would be frustrating t= o find out you have spent loads getting the vehicle ready and not permitted = to drive it. As yours is an 80", the RHD bits will be easy to sou= rce in the UK. Shipping might be a headache. <BR> I know this sounds a bit far out, but any shot at finding a RHD chassis to = use for a restructured vehicle? Africa right? I know it is a big= place, club contacts might be a possible source.<BR> <BR> Tom Bache<BR> Avondale, PA<BR> USA<BR> </FONT></FONT><FONT FACE=3D"Helvetica"><BR> </FONT></BLOCKQUOTE><FONT FACE=3D"Helvetica"><BR> </FONT> </BODY> </HTML> --B_3186158571_1733136-- To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
 |
SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
|
|
 |
Re: SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
|
|
 |
SER1 Re: LHD to RHD
|