Re: SER1 no one will insure my Landy against theft as it has no door locks.

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/04]

Jon Hutchings wrote:
> What about if you remove the doors completely ? :-)
I suspect that doors (at least, the bottoms) are required by law.


> You could always argue that the doors are optional.
Hee hee...

At least with the door-tops (and the passengers windscreen wiper) you 
can point to the brocure and point them out as optional extras ;-)


        -- 
          Ian Stuart, Perl Laghu. EDINA, Edinburgh University.
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| This is a signature. It is either a statement defining the     |
|  scope of the message (and thus an attempt to indemnify the    |
|  sender from any misunderstanding), or is some witty comment   |
|  designed to show how much of a sophisticate the sender is (or |
|  isn't)                                                        |
| In practise this is the bit you ignore. This has to be here    |
|  for you to ignore it, for that's what ignore means:           |
| Pronunciation: ig-'nOr, -'nor       Function: transitive verb  |
| 1 : to refuse to take notice of.                               |
| 2 : to reject (a bill of indictment) as ungrounded             |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Works web site:    http://edina.ac.uk/                         |
| Personal web site: http://lucas.ucs.ed.ac.uk/                  |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+

To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail