Re: SER1 1948 (Spitfire) reconditioning

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/05/12]

From: Diana Alan
Subject: Re: SER1 1948 (Spitfire) reconditioning
Date: 23:53 on 12 May 2005
Michael

And I always thought it was because people were too cheap to buy a tin of
paint!

You learn something new (or is it old and unrestored?) every day.

Cheers
Diana -{:-))

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Carradine" <mc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 1:14 AM
Subject: RE: SER1 1948 (Spitfire) reconditioning


At 01:09 AM 5/12/2005, Diana wrote:
>Would having the manufacturers plate and making everything else constitute
>a "historic aircraft" or a "historic aircraft manufacturers plate" with
>replica aircraft?

That's why in some circles the original vehicle in it's original
unrestored state is more authentic and valuable than if restored.

Michael Carradine
80" 1950 RHD LR
unrestored


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail




To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

RE: SER1 1948 Spitfire reconditioning
dianaa 08:09 on 12 May 2005

RE: SER1 1948 (Spitfire) reconditioning
Michael Carradine 15:14 on 12 May 2005

Re: SER1 1948 (Spitfire) reconditioning
Diana Alan 23:53 on 12 May 2005

Generated at 07:00 on 17 May 2005 by mariachi v0.52