Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/04]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Date: 15:16 on 04 Jun 2004
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 11:06:30AM -0400, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> 0.95 fails 9/18 tests in 14-might_have.t when you do that, but 0.96 passes
> with flying colors. Still, please tweak Blurb.pm so there is no regression in
> the future.

Will do.

> I'd still like to discuss adding an "add_*" method for has_many()
> relationships, similar to has_many()'s "add_to_*" method. Any interest there?

I'm not seeing the benefits yet, as you can just add through setting,
but feel free to convince me ...

Tony

(message missing)

Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Edward J. Sabol 06:04 on 04 Jun 2004

Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Tony Bowden 15:16 on 04 Jun 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52