Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/08]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Date: 11:09 on 08 Jun 2004
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 05:38:00AM -0400, Edward J. Sabol wrote:
> Class::DBI::Relationship::MightHave do you think would be the best place to
> do that? remap_arguments? methods? Or perhaps generic support for adding
> relationship-related column groups should be implemented in
> Class::DBI::Relationship?

Probably generic. Just another thing that would be added to the list of
methods to call at setup.

> It's a bit of a mouthful. How about making $class->columns($arrayref) a
> documented wrapper for $class->__grouper->columns_in(@array)?

I'm really convinced of overloading columns quite that much...

Tony

(message missing)

Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Edward J. Sabol 06:04 on 04 Jun 2004

Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Tony Bowden 11:09 on 08 Jun 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52