Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/08]

From: Drew Taylor
Subject: Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Date: 13:02 on 08 Jun 2004
Tony Bowden said on 6/8/2004 7:09 AM:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 05:38:00AM -0400, Edward J. Sabol wrote:

>>It's a bit of a mouthful. How about making $class->columns($arrayref) a
>>documented wrapper for $class->__grouper->columns_in(@array)?
> 
> 
> I'm really convinced of overloading columns quite that much...

I assume "not really convinced". :-) If so I agree. So how about just 
adding $class->columns_in(@array) as a wrapper around the grouper method 
call?

Drew
        -- 
        ---------------------------------------------------------
Drew Taylor          *  Web app development & consulting
drew@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx  *  Site implementation & hosting
www.drewtaylor.com   *  perl/mod_perl/DBI/mysql/postgres
---------------------------------------------------------

(message missing)

Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Edward J. Sabol 06:04 on 04 Jun 2004

Re: Can we make might_have() relationships easier to use?
Drew Taylor 13:02 on 08 Jun 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52