Re: Apache pre-forking

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/08/02]

From: Tim Bunce
Subject: Re: Apache pre-forking
Date: 21:17 on 02 Aug 2004
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:43:43PM +0100, Simon Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Tony Bowden wrote:
> 
> > So, IIUC
> >  - It's a good idea to pre-load modules in your Apache startup
> >  - It's a bad idea to have database connections as part of these
> >
> > So how do people marry these two concepts if they're being sufficiently
> > lazy to use a driver specific Class::DBI subclass that sets up the
> > column info etc at compile time by accessing the database?
> 
> I think it's ok to have db connections pre-fork, as long as they are
> closed before the fork takes place. IIRC, the problems occur with some
> drivers when the handles are duplicated.
> 
> I could be wrong.

I think you, and Perrin, are right.

Tim.

Apache pre-forking
Tony Bowden 15:35 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Simon Wilcox 15:43 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Tim Bunce 21:17 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Stuart Johnston 16:16 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Perrin Harkins 17:47 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Tim Bunce 21:19 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Perrin Harkins 21:50 on 02 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
jason scott gessner 00:06 on 03 Aug 2004

Re: Apache pre-forking
Perrin Harkins 17:33 on 03 Aug 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52