Re: SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/10/19]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)
Date: 15:26 on 19 Oct 2004
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 08:10:59AM -0700, Todd Holbrook wrote:
> I posted a patch which was a step in this direction a couple of months
> ago but didn't get any feedback.  It's in the "Any more thoughts on
> the LIMIT/extra SQL issue?" thread.  If anyone is interested I can
> repost.  It's not a final solution but may generate some discussion.

I still have it flagged to look at in more detail. I didn't auite
understand what was going on at first glance.

Tony

(message missing)

prefixing table names?
bowen 15:20 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
jason 15:36 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Tony Bowden 18:45 on 15 Oct 2004

SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)
jason scott gessner 00:08 on 19 Oct 2004

Re: SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 09:46 on 19 Oct 2004

Re: SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 10:00 on 19 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Tony Bowden 15:36 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bowen Dwelle 22:05 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bradley K. Embree 22:16 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bowen Dwelle 22:48 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bowen Dwelle 23:20 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Perrin Harkins 16:44 on 15 Oct 2004

Re: SQL Generation ( was Re: prefixing table names?)
Tony Bowden 15:26 on 19 Oct 2004

FromCGI and Untaint question
Peter Speltz 17:23 on 19 Oct 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bowen Dwelle 01:31 on 02 Nov 2004

Re: prefixing table names?
Bowen Dwelle 16:36 on 02 Nov 2004

Generated at 11:35 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52