Re: one to one revisited (has_own)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/24]

--- William McKee <william@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:16:58AM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> > Unless i'm missing something, I think a has_own relationship and
> > constraints to might_have could be powerful and take a whole lot of
> > guess work out of program logic. 
> 
> Peter,
> 
> I follow your thinking and have a project with similar needs for
> multiple types of addresses and phone numbers. Right now, I have a mess
> of code that uses triggers to populate temporary fields such as
> billing_address, billing_city, billing_state, etc.
> 
> I like your proposed solution and could throw it into my current project
> for testing if you have some code.
> 
> 
> William
> 

Cool. No code yet. I'm gonna work on it today. i'll pass it tt you when i get
it ready for testing. Thanks.



=====
pjs

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com