Re: one to one revisited (has_own)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/25]

From: Andreas Fromm
Subject: Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Date: 08:19 on 25 Jan 2005
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Maybe you could post it here too. I think there are more peaple
interested in that. Me, for example.  Isn't there a Wiki where such
things could be posted?

Peter Speltz wrote:
| --- William McKee <william@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
|
|
|>On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:16:58AM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
|>
|>>Unless i'm missing something, I think a has_own relationship and
|>>constraints to might_have could be powerful and take a whole lot of
|>>guess work out of program logic.
|>
|>Peter,
|>
|>I follow your thinking and have a project with similar needs for
|>multiple types of addresses and phone numbers. Right now, I have a mess
|>of code that uses triggers to populate temporary fields such as
|>billing_address, billing_city, billing_state, etc.
|>
|>I like your proposed solution and could throw it into my current project
|>for testing if you have some code.
|>
|>
|>William
|>
|
|
| Cool. No code yet. I'm gonna work on it today. i'll pass it tt you
when i get
| it ready for testing. Thanks.
|
|
|
| =====
| pjs
|
| __________________________________________________
| Do You Yahoo!?
| Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
| http://mail.yahoo.com

- --
Grüsse,

Andreas Fromm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFB9gD9UmBtSMq5cGURAqlNAJ41FuOqxu+oAwlZE8WCekWEA0XZTwCdH+WO
ZPoGLQLLioPt9UNYT3wDY14=
=iHhb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

(message missing)

one to one relationship revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 22:26 on 20 Jan 2005

Re: one to one relationship revisited (has_own)
Perrin Harkins 21:59 on 21 Jan 2005

Re: one to one relationship revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 05:11 on 22 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 18:16 on 22 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
William McKee 15:39 on 24 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 16:01 on 24 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Andreas Fromm 08:19 on 25 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 19:34 on 25 Jan 2005

Selecting from a datetime field in MySQL
John Day 22:24 on 25 Jan 2005

Re: Selecting from a datetime field in MySQL
Perrin Harkins 22:29 on 25 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 23:24 on 26 Jan 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 17:40 on 01 Feb 2005

Re: one to one revisited (has_own)
Peter Speltz 08:23 on 25 Jan 2005

Generated at 12:39 on 05 Feb 2005 by mariachi v0.52