Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/06]

From: Dan Sully
Subject: Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Date: 18:18 on 06 Apr 2005
* Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR shaped the electrons to say...

>> This is on solaris, using Sun's CC.  (Oooh, that could be a bad deal.)
>
>I work with Solaris machines a lot, and one thing I've learned is to take
>Sun's cc completely out of my path and install gnu gcc (sunfreeware.com is a
>good source for gcc binaries). Tons of open-source stuff breaks (including
>Perl modules) with Sun's compiler, particularly on older Solaris (< 9)
>versions, so I suspect this is your problem.

At my previous job - we were a Solaris shop, and I preferred to use Sun's
compiler. No issues on Solaris 8 & 9, with heavy use of Class::DBI.

Perl 5.0053 & eventually 5.8.3

-D
        -- 
        On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.

Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 17:28 on 06 Apr 2005

RE: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 18:11 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dan Sully 18:18 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 18:21 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Perrin Harkins 18:28 on 06 Apr 2005

RE: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 18:30 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 09:37 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 16:25 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 07:18 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Masayoshi Sekimura 02:11 on 11 May 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 09:59 on 11 May 2005

Generated at 06:54 on 17 May 2005 by mariachi v0.52