Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/11]

From: Dave Howorth
Subject: Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Date: 09:37 on 11 Apr 2005
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> I'm working with a client that has Perl 5.8.3 installed, and
> when I try to "make test" on Class::DBI 0.96, I get:
> 
>     t/16-reserved.........ok 2/5Argument "Bad Taste" isn't numeric in subroutine entry at /ssa/homedirs/02/48/merlyn/.cpan/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/DBIx/ContextualFetch.pm line 51.
>     #     Failed test (t/16-reserved.t at line 27)
>     #          got: undef
>     #     expected: '10'
>     t/16-reserved.........ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 5.            
>     t/16-reserved.........dubious                                                
>             Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
>     DIED. FAILED test 3
>             Failed 1/5 tests, 80.00% okay
> 
> Is this a known problem?  Is the only solution to get past 5.8.3?
> Or are my problems somewhere else?
> 
> This is on solaris, using Sun's CC.  (Oooh, that could be a bad deal.)

FWIW, I'm also seeing this problem on Linux, so I don't think Solaris is 
the problem:

cpepc210-1:~ # uname -a
Linux cpepc210-1 2.6.4-52-smp #1 SMP Wed Apr 7 02:11:20 UTC 2004 i686 
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
cpepc210-1:~ # perl -v

This is perl, v5.8.3 built for i586-linux-thread-multi

cpepc210-1:~/.cpan/build/Class-DBI-0.96 # make test
...snip...
t/16-reserved.........ok 2/5Argument "Bad Taste" isn't numeric in 
subroutine entry at 
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/DBIx/ContextualFetch.pm line 51.
#     Failed test (t/16-reserved.t at line 27)
#          got: undef
#     expected: '10'
t/16-reserved.........ok 5/5# Looks like you failed 1 tests of 5. 

t/16-reserved.........dubious 

	Test returned status 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Scalar found where operator expected at (eval 153) line 1, near "'int' 
$__val"
	(Missing operator before   $__val?)
DIED. FAILED test 3
	Failed 1/5 tests, 80.00% okay

Cheers, Dave

Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 17:28 on 06 Apr 2005

RE: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 18:11 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
merlyn (Randal L. Schwartz) 18:21 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Perrin Harkins 18:28 on 06 Apr 2005

RE: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 18:30 on 06 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 09:37 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 16:25 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 07:18 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Masayoshi Sekimura 02:11 on 11 May 2005

Re: Class::DBI 0.96 and perl 5.8.3 - bad combo?
Dave Howorth 09:59 on 11 May 2005

Generated at 06:54 on 17 May 2005 by mariachi v0.52