Re: Columns substitution?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/05/28]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: Columns substitution?
Date: 20:47 on 28 May 2005
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 05:45:14PM +0100, Aaron Trevena wrote:
> > I was waiting to see if it survived first! Once something is documneted
> > it's a lot harder to roll back once you realise it was a mistake.
> um... so long as you put it in the changelog, I might be using a lot
> of undocumented internals in various Class::PINT and
> C::DBI::Relationship modules ;) Yes, I am a very bad person.

That's one of the measures I use to decide if it was a success or
failure :)

If it's in widespread use, even without being documented, it's probably
a Good Thing!

Tony

(message missing)

Columns substitution?
Lonely Rolling Star 23:14 on 25 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Tony Bowden 07:50 on 27 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Matt S Trout 12:48 on 27 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Tony Bowden 12:53 on 27 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Aaron Trevena 13:19 on 28 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Tony Bowden 15:39 on 28 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Aaron Trevena 16:45 on 28 May 2005

Re: Columns substitution?
Tony Bowden 20:47 on 28 May 2005

Generated at 20:11 on 05 Jun 2005 by mariachi v0.52