Re: [Templates] Newbie TT2 with CGI or mod_perl2 question?

> Heh... I once said that... then I saw the performance numbers from our Apache2 test box...

On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 13:14, Todd Freeman wrote:
> Heh... I once said that... then I saw the performance numbers from our Apache2 test box...

Yeah, Apache 1 has such poor performance that nearly all of the largest
sites in the world use it...

Seriously, the mod_perl benchmarks I've seen put the performance about
the same.  It may be different for static files, but I don't serve
static files from my mod_perl server.

> Apache2 is stable these days. It is what the apache guys are doing continued development on.

Apache 1 is fully-supported, and will continue to be.

> If you are doing new development I would highly suggest using Apache 2
> with mod_perl2 to do it under. If not you are just shooting yourself
> in the foot by putting off the change for a little while.

I'm glad to see people using mod_perl 2, but there is nothing at all
wrong with using Apache 1 for new development.  It is not going away,
and it is the most common platform for new mod_perl development at this
time.

- Perrin

_______________________________________________
templates mailing list
templates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
http://lists.template-toolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/templates