Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/23]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Date: 15:24 on 23 Jun 2004

On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 03:54:38PM +0100, Addison, Mark wrote:
> Linking tables with no data (ie just the 2 keys to make the join 
> across) are sometimes referred to as 'weak entities' in ER modelling
> circles. So maybe something like weak_links might work?

I think that'd confuse people too much with Perl's concept of weak
references...

Tony

(message missing)

CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 20:45 on 21 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:59 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 22:59 on 21 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 17:49 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 19:45 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:02 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 20:11 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:57 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 23:19 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 07:16 on 24 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 08:16 on 23 Jun 2004

RE: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Addison, Mark 14:54 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 15:24 on 23 Jun 2004

RE: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Addison, Mark 15:52 on 23 Jun 2004