Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/23]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Date: 20:02 on 23 Jun 2004

On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 08:49:31PM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 21:59:51 +0100, Tony Bowden wrote:
> > Go for it!
> How about this?
> It's being used in my demo site for Maypole/manymany at the moment.

I'd really prefer that Class::DBI::Relationship::* was reserved for
classes that are actually Relationships, in that they inherit from
Class::DBI::Relationship, or, at very least, get installed via the
add_relationship_type() method.

Otherwise it looks good. (Althought it could probably do with a concrete
example in the docs: maybe the Film->role->actor one?)

Tony

(message missing)

CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 20:45 on 21 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:59 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 22:59 on 21 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 17:49 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 19:45 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:02 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 20:11 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 20:57 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 23:19 on 22 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 07:16 on 24 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Yuval Kogman 08:16 on 23 Jun 2004

RE: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Addison, Mark 14:54 on 23 Jun 2004

Re: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Tony Bowden 15:24 on 23 Jun 2004

RE: CDBI::Relationship::Glue ?
Addison, Mark 15:52 on 23 Jun 2004