Re: might_have , has_many request

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/28]

From: Cees Hek
Subject: Re: might_have , has_many request
Date: 22:43 on 28 Feb 2005

> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:25:36PM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> > I'd like it if might_have and has_many relationships took constraints. I've
> > patched my copies so i can use them the old way or like this:

This looks similar to a patch I provided last year that Tony said
would appear in the next version.  The relevant thread starts here:

http://groups.kasei.com/mail/arc/cdbi-talk/2004-06/msg00053.html

And Tony's response is here (threads got messed up somehow)

http://groups.kasei.com/mail/arc/cdbi-talk/2004-10/msg00219.html

This doesn't cover the might_have case, only the has_many...

        -- 
        Cees Hek

(message missing)

might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 21:25 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:08 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:42 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Cees Hek 22:43 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 23:24 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 09:41 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 18:21 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 19:05 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 19:27 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:09 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:51 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 23:39 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 01:45 on 05 Mar 2005