Re: might_have , has_many request

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/01]

--- Tony Bowden <tony-cdbitalk@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:21:18AM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> > One thing that doesn't work is when
> > you say $obj->add_to_* without the constraint column , the constraint is
> not
> > filled in and that column gets default
> 
> Hmmm. That's not meant to happen, and there's code that appears to
> handle that case. And t/09 seems to test for this.
> 
> >.Similaryly the constraint is not enforced in an add_to_* call. 
> 
> Again, there's code to do that. And a test for it.
> 
> What version of Class::DBI are you running this against? 
> 

.96. I just patched HasMany.pm with one line from archive. Am i missing
something? Was an updated patch posted to handle this?  I don't see a
constraint test in t/09*. 

I just checked the database to make sure Maypole wasn't deceiving about what is
in those columns.  Its doing just what i said it is and that's my exact code. 


=====
pjs

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com