Re: might_have , has_many request

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/02/28]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: might_have , has_many request
Date: 22:08 on 28 Feb 2005

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 01:25:36PM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> I'd like it if might_have and has_many relationships took constraints. I've
> patched my copies so i can use them the old way or like this:

I don't understand what your constraints actually do, but feel free to
create your own Relationship classes and throw up on CPAN. Then people
can just declare that they want has_many / might_have to use your versions
rather than the built-ins if they want this behaviour.

If you need anything in the default Relationships facotred out better to
make it easier to subclass them, just shout.

Tony

(message missing)

might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 21:25 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:08 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:42 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Cees Hek 22:43 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 23:24 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 09:41 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 18:21 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 19:05 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 19:27 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:09 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:51 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 23:39 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 01:45 on 05 Mar 2005