Re: might_have , has_many request

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/03/01]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: might_have , has_many request
Date: 09:41 on 01 Mar 2005

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 03:24:40PM -0800, Peter Speltz wrote:
> One thing it doesn't look like you can provide the "foreign_key" ("third")
> argument in your patch.  Just one more line of code in remap_args in the if
> (ref $fkey eq "HASH") case would do it. 

Can you give a failing test case for this?

Tony

(message missing)

might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 21:25 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:08 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:42 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Cees Hek 22:43 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 23:24 on 28 Feb 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 09:41 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 18:21 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 19:05 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 19:27 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 22:09 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 22:51 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Tony Bowden 23:39 on 01 Mar 2005

Re: might_have , has_many request
Peter Speltz 01:45 on 05 Mar 2005