Re: mod_perl speed difference between Fedora Core 1 and Fedora Core 3

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/01/06]

From: John D. Sanders
Subject: Re: mod_perl speed difference between Fedora Core 1 and Fedora Core 3
Date: 19:01 on 06 Jan 2005
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Sorry for butting in here but you have piqued my curiosity.&nbsp; Is it
better to do a minimal install of RHAS and build up from there with
source or should I use what ships and just add to it.<br>
<blockquote cite="mid1105037771.6513.312.camel@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxx"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 12:40 -0600, Frank Wiles wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">  While I agree recompling Perl will help, you might also look into 
  whether or not SELinux is slowing you down.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
  <pre wrap=""><!---->
How can you tell, and what can you do about it?  Any specific info would
be greatly appreciated.

Regarding recompiling perl, as I've said in the past, you can get a
10-15% speedup over the perl that comes with Fedora just by compiling
perl from source with all the default options.  The one they ship has
debugging on and is compiled for threads.

- Perrin

  </pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

Re: mod_perl speed difference between Fedora Core 1 and Fedora Core 3
John D. Sanders 19:01 on 06 Jan 2005

Generated at 08:54 on 14 Mar 2005 by mariachi v0.52