Re: Stolen Ideas

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/08/10]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: Stolen Ideas
Date: 21:08 on 10 Aug 2004

On Tue, 2004-08-10 at 16:42, Scott McWhirter wrote:
> $homers_fave = $my_brewery->get_beer_by_key('Duff');

Isn't this already there?  See the Limiting section in the POD. 
Assuming you have a has_many called beers:
$homers_fave = $my_brewery->beers(id => 'Duff');

Or maybe you are really talking many-to-many relations with a mapping
table here?  That would make more sense, and is currently supported only
in a sketchy way.

> Indexed relationships are the same, except that order is preserved, and 
> instead of keys you use integers (Arrays).

Same as above; see Ordering in the POD.

> Distinct from this is Arrays and Hashes which are INTERNAL to the 
> objects. That is, they don't represent a relationship between two 
> classes, but store a serialised Array or Hash of flat values in a field 
> in the table.

You could do that with inflate/deflate and has_a.  I'm not a big fan of
this approach though.  It's not normalized.

> The whole purpose of this is to build an orthogonal object-relational 
> mapping to take on Tangram - which would be fantastic because debugging 
> with Tangram is bloody near impossible due to poor input marshalling and 
> virtually non existent error handling and bogus error messages.

Tangram is very neat and very magical.  Unfortunately, it's insistence
on generating the schema and lack of support for custom SQL are huge
problems in my opinion.

- Perrin

(message missing)

Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 18:58 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
ed-cdbi 19:03 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 19:06 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
ed-cdbi 19:08 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 19:11 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
ed-cdbi 19:19 on 10 Aug 2004

RE: Stolen Ideas
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 19:11 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 19:27 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Nelson C. T. Ferraz 15:14 on 12 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Scott McWhirter 19:18 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 19:28 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Scott McWhirter 20:42 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 21:08 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 21:33 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Scott McWhirter 22:58 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 23:23 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Gregory P. Smith 19:55 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 20:02 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 21:47 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 22:23 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 22:37 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 22:57 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Yuval Kogman 15:39 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 22:02 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
ed-cdbi 22:11 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 22:25 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tim Bunce 08:53 on 24 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 22:16 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 22:42 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 22:16 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 23:18 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Scott McWhirter 23:48 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 00:22 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 03:45 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 08:36 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Aaron Trevena 19:05 on 13 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Aaron Trevena 17:13 on 15 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Dan Friedman 04:47 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 08:39 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Branislav Zahradnik 15:21 on 11 Aug 2004

RE: Stolen Ideas
Thomas, Mark - BLS CTR 19:13 on 13 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 23:16 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Perrin Harkins 23:42 on 10 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tim Bunce 08:48 on 24 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Tony Bowden 21:57 on 11 Aug 2004

Re: Stolen Ideas
Simon Cozens 09:03 on 24 Aug 2004