Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/04]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Date: 23:03 on 04 Apr 2005

On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:47:21PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> I think Class::DBI can (and should) be altered to not depend on
> DBIx::ContextualFetch. It would mean duplicating some DBIx::ContextualFetch
> functionality within Class::DBI. It's not much code and, to my mind, the
> benefits outweigh the philosophical concerns.

I disagree, but I'll certainly listen to the argument.

Tony

(message missing)

using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 04:49 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 10:42 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 15:00 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 19:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tim Bunce 22:47 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 23:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Juan Camacho 04:16 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 11:14 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Jim Brandt 17:19 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 19:30 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 22:04 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 03:30 on 05 Apr 2005