Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/05]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Date: 03:30 on 05 Apr 2005

Tony Bowden wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:47:21PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> 
>>I think Class::DBI can (and should) be altered to not depend on
>>DBIx::ContextualFetch. It would mean duplicating some DBIx::ContextualFetch
>>functionality within Class::DBI. It's not much code and, to my mind, the
>>benefits outweigh the philosophical concerns.
> 
> 
> I disagree, but I'll certainly listen to the argument.

In my opinion, the argument is that it makes it possible to use database 
handles that were not initially created for CDBI.  This is the problem 
that both Chris and I are running into, and it limits how easily CDBI 
can be incorporated into an existing system.

- Perrin

(message missing)

using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 04:49 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 10:42 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 15:00 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 19:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tim Bunce 22:47 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 23:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Juan Camacho 04:16 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 11:14 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Jim Brandt 17:19 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 19:30 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 22:04 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 03:30 on 05 Apr 2005