Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/05]

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?=
Subject: Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Date: 11:14 on 05 Apr 2005

On Apr 4, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Tony Bowden wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:47:21PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
>> I think Class::DBI can (and should) be altered to not depend on
>> DBIx::ContextualFetch. It would mean duplicating some 
>> DBIx::ContextualFetch
>> functionality within Class::DBI. It's not much code and, to my mind, 
>> the
>> benefits outweigh the philosophical concerns.
>
> I disagree, but I'll certainly listen to the argument.

It'd make it easier to phase Class::DBI models into existing 
applications.

Right now I have a project where I can't use Class::DBI for a part of 
it because of the extra database connection (I can't just make the 
default database connection use DBIx::ContextualFetch).

  - ask

        -- 
        http://www.askbjoernhansen.com/

(message missing)

using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 04:49 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 10:42 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 15:00 on 25 Mar 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 19:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tim Bunce 22:47 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 23:03 on 04 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Juan Camacho 04:16 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ask_Bj=F8rn_Hansen?= 11:14 on 05 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Jim Brandt 17:19 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Tony Bowden 19:30 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Chris Winters 22:04 on 01 Apr 2005

Re: using DBI handles managed elsewhere
Perrin Harkins 03:30 on 05 Apr 2005