Re: SER1 Greenpeace

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/05/16]

From: Ian Balcom
Subject: Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Date: 16:35 on 16 May 2005
Surprising to hear such anti-green sentiments being tossed about under
the guise of humor.  Let's face it.  Unless we (humans from all sides
of the planet) makes some concessions there will drastic and
long-lasting negative quality of life repercussions for us and
generations to come.  Why is it that people who are "consider myself
green" types so quick to point towards the faults of the green
movement?  I mean get real! no effort is without error! Especially one
so huge and important as saving the environment.  If I protest to save
a one-thousand year old tree (just a symbol mind you) from the
clutches of a developers machine I will, without fail, anger not only
the developer, but the land owner, the future renters or residents,
and sometime even people who have no stake in the place but have a
sort of allergic reaction to everything green, etc.  Those of you who
are complaining about the relatively minor inconvenience of changes to
fire break policy, archaic documentation for the Rainbow Warrior, or
the observation that the latest generation of Land Rover is a gass
sucking SUV with very little of its original utility left, or some
some short haired hippy in a suit chaining himself to a tree to save
it from the likes of another WalMart Mega-Store have got to ask your
self where are your priorities?  Mine: good water, good air, healthy
children, and lots of hopping, chirping, fuzzy creatures to keep the
food chain functioning.

PS what the heck is an enviroterrorist? Have you ever met one? I feel
personally attacked by such labels as I am whole heartily dedicated to
such causes.  It would behoove us to stop labeling people we do not
agree with.  A developer is a developer but not a developoterrorist.

On 5/16/05, Diana Alan <dianaa@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx> wrote:
> Hi Guys
> 
> I've got a greenpiece in fact almost the whole car in green!
> 
> Cheers
> Diana
> 
> P.S.  You can't have a decent discussion with many enviroterrorists.  Green
> activists have had most of the fire access trails in virtually all of our
> national parks closed to the public and even specialist groups.  The result
> is that now the volunteer fire-fighters don't know where most of the trails
> go and the effect of keeping the trails un-blocked by fallen trees which
> used to happen with public access no longer occurs.  Lives of volunteer
> fire-fighters will be lost with this closure if they haven't been already.
> But the green terrorists don't care, what's one less human, they want
> wilderness where only the exotic feral animals and exotic weeds are free to
> breed.
> P.P.S  I consider myself green and what's more I did Zoology as one of my
> majors in my undergraduate science degree.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Wykes" <tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> To: <series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Cc: <Thomas.heap@xxx.xx.xx>
> Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:12 PM
> Subject: Re: SER1 Greenpeace
> 
> A car company, who has 70% of all the cars it has ever made still on the
> road, is as far as I'm concerned pretty "green".
> 
> Likewise every endangered species or humanitarian effort has had help from
> a Land Rover in some form or other.
> 
> I'm fully in support of "green" issues but I wish these extremist would get
> their facts right.
> 
> (Thomas I thought this would amuse you)
> 
> At 10:57 16/05/2005, you wrote:
> >Hi All,
> >
> >Just seen this from the BBC:
> >
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4550593.stm
> >
> >Maybe of interest......
> >
> >Cheers
> >Mark
> >Halifax UK
> >
> >To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
> 
> Regards.
> 
> Tom Wykes.
> 
> PCB Designer
> Cambridge Broadband.
> Tel.+44 (0)1223 703000
> Fax.+44 (0)1223 703001
> DDI. +44 (0)1223 703044
> tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
> www.cambridgebroadband.com
> 
> If you don't live life on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
> 
> To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
> 
> To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
> 
> 


        -- 
        Ian N. Balcom
PhD Student
Environmental Toxicology Department
University of California
Riverside CA  92521
909.380.2176


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 09:57 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Tom Wykes 10:12 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 10:32 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Balcom 16:35 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
"lrnick 22:04 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Allan Harding 23:00 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Matthew J. Clark 22:36 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 22:37 on 16 May 2005

AW: SER1 Greenpeace
Peter Hirsch 19:13 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Michael Bishop 19:13 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
chris johnston 23:36 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Jeremy Bartlett 01:59 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 02:33 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
chris johnston 22:08 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1Stats was Greenpeace
Michael (MDyer) 09:25 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 10:31 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Graeme Aldous 07:18 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 08:22 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 23:04 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Peter Vollers 11:24 on 18 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ben Pooley 14:26 on 18 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Balcom 01:33 on 19 May 2005

AW: SER1 Greenpeace
Ulrico Becker 14:20 on 19 May 2005

RE: SER1 Greenpeace
23:17 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 07:36 on 19 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Stuart 08:04 on 19 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Channon G Coats 14:06 on 21 May 2005

Generated at 16:59 on 28 Jul 2005 by mariachi v0.52