RE: SER1 Greenpeace

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/05/17]

From:
Subject: RE: SER1 Greenpeace
Date: 23:17 on 17 May 2005

All this debate has been kinda interesting....seems to me
A few issues have emerged.

1. There are quite a few passionate about the environment....
2. Some confused about what environmentalists and terrorists are...
3. Seems we are all people who think fairly deeply about a whole range
of issues
4. We all still like Land Rovers!......

In my mind this is all good except item 2.

When all is said and done there is one thing for sure.....keeping 50
year
Old cars going is a VERY worthy thing to do.....the environmental
reasons
Are many fold....in the end its all about carbon flux.....

It was said to me here a few months ago by one of the carbon accounting
boffins the "zero carbon" balance point for a motor vehicle is 17.5
years and if it is kept going beyond that then you are in carbon
credit!....IIRC

If that's the case then Series one LR's are now in Credit 2.5 times or
more...

Not a bad way to conduct ones motoring and environmental management I'd
say.....

Bruce Stewart
Technical Officer
CSIRO Land & Water
Ph 02 62465583
Mb 0418 295 864
http://www.clw.csiro.au/staff/StewartB/

-----Original Message-----
From: series1-host@xxxxxxxxx.xxx [mailto:series1-host@xxxxxxxxx.xxx] On
Behalf Of Diana Alan
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2005 9:04 AM
To: series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: SER1 Greenpeace

Dear List

Unfortunately one of the few places where terrorism was successful was
the
Jews in Palestine under the British and look at Israel today.

We have got so far off the plot and it's all got too personal so that's
the
last I will say about it.

Or anything.

Goodbye
Diana




To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 09:57 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Tom Wykes 10:12 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 10:32 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Balcom 16:35 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
"lrnick 22:04 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Allan Harding 23:00 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Matthew J. Clark 22:36 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 22:37 on 16 May 2005

AW: SER1 Greenpeace
Peter Hirsch 19:13 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Michael Bishop 19:13 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
chris johnston 23:36 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Jeremy Bartlett 01:59 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 02:33 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
chris johnston 22:08 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1Stats was Greenpeace
Michael (MDyer) 09:25 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 10:31 on 16 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Graeme Aldous 07:18 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 08:22 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Diana Alan 23:04 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Peter Vollers 11:24 on 18 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ben Pooley 14:26 on 18 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Balcom 01:33 on 19 May 2005

AW: SER1 Greenpeace
Ulrico Becker 14:20 on 19 May 2005

RE: SER1 Greenpeace
23:17 on 17 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Mark Strangways 07:36 on 19 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Ian Stuart 08:04 on 19 May 2005

Re: SER1 Greenpeace
Channon G Coats 14:06 on 21 May 2005