Re: SER1 S2 gearbox

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/11/02]

Regarding the issue of the Ser. II trans having the filler cap on the 
top like the Ser I's, this was a typical feature on Ser II and III 
military transmissions.

Norm Lewis
Littleton, Colorado
USA

Mark Strangways wrote:

>Ah, but if they had the same gearbox, how come there is not a  flap on the transmission tunnel so that you can fill them in the same way as a Series One?
>
>
>
>
>Early series II's had the 2.0 engine, so had the same gearbox as the 
>series I's....
>
>(it's also the same bolt-pattern as the 2.6, if you're remotely 
>interested...)
>
>
>  
>


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail