Re: object caching and mod_perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/06/08]

From: Tony Bowden
Subject: Re: object caching and mod_perl
Date: 13:46 on 08 Jun 2004
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 08:28:45AM -0500, jason scott gessner wrote:
> So i have two questions.

Fear and surprise?

> 1)	where is this type of caching useful?  I took a brief look at the 
> code and it seems that it does some sort of checking, but how does it 
> know when to kill an object?

When it goes out of scope.

> 2)	Should this new behaviour even be the default?  This took a working 
> application and made it all wonky.  Did any other people encounter 
> this?

It shouldn't do. I'd like to know more about why it does.

> 3)	is there a better way to have this behave with mod_perl applications?

It should just work.

Tony

(message missing)

TEMP columns not populated by sth_to_objects in 0.96
David Jack Olrik 08:54 on 08 Jun 2004

object caching and mod_perl
jason scott gessner 13:28 on 08 Jun 2004

Re: object caching and mod_perl
Tony Bowden 13:46 on 08 Jun 2004

Re: object caching and mod_perl
Perrin Harkins 14:02 on 08 Jun 2004

Re: object caching and mod_perl
jason scott gessner 14:11 on 08 Jun 2004

Re: object caching and mod_perl
Edward J. Sabol 14:52 on 08 Jun 2004

Re: object caching and mod_perl
jason scott gessner 16:31 on 11 Jun 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52