An archive of the main Class::DBI discussion list, mostly for testing purposes and partly because it's useful to have around.
<<
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
>>
[ Page 37 of 47 ]
![]() |
small note on cdbi documentation
|
![]() |
calculating aggregates
|
![]() |
CDBI::Pager and has_many
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: CDBI::Pager and has_many
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: CDBI::Pager and has_many
|
![]() |
simple relationship with has_a
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: simple relationship with has_a
|
![]() |
search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: search on Oracle CHAR primary key column
|
![]() |
dependency issue
|
![]() |
Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Weird Problems when using a Class::DBI subclass together with Apache::AuthCookie
|
![]() |
Deleting might_have records
|
![]() |
Safe deletions and triggers
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Safe deletions and triggers
|
![]() |
Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Vague thoughts about is_a and might_be relationships
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
is_a relationship?
|
![]() |
(message missing) |
![]() |
![]() |
Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Pass in a DBI Object?
|
![]() |
dependency problem in CDBI 0.96
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: dependency problem in CDBI 0.96
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: dependency problem in CDBI 0.96
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
"argumemt" typo (was Re: dependency problem in CDBI 0.96)
|
![]() |
ANNOUNCE: Class::DBI::Plugin::HTML 0.8
|
![]() |
Where is set_db and set_up_table
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Where is set_db and set_up_table
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Where is set_db and set_up_table
|
![]() |
Having Problems Creating Simple Relationship
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Having Problems Creating Simple Relationship
|
![]() |
When do Class::DBI objects lose their values?
|
![]() |
![]() |
RE: When do Class::DBI objects lose their values?
|
![]() |
Dealing with database level updates
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Dealing with database level updates
|
![]() |
(message missing) |
![]() |
![]() |
Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Search for specific field rather than primary key
|
![]() |
Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Re: Better handling of constraint failures?
|
![]() |
why does retrieve_all return CDBI::Iterator in array context?
|
![]() |
![]() |
Re: why does retrieve_all return CDBI::Iterator in array context?
|
Generated at 20:44 on 01 Mar 2006 by mariachi v0.52