Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/09/01]

From: William McKee
Subject: Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Date: 14:44 on 01 Sep 2004
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 11:02:37AM +0100, Peter Pimley wrote:
> Is that the correct way to go about this?  The problem I have is that a 
> seperate process accessing the same database does not notice the change, 
> and seems to keep the old ClassB object in memory.

Hi Peter,

I've seen the same effects and used the same workaround. I hope that one
of the more knowledgeable folks on the list will offer some feedback for
us both.


William

        -- 
        Knowmad Services Inc.
http://www.knowmad.com

(message missing)

Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Peter Pimley 10:02 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
William McKee 14:44 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:09 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 15:32 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:33 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 17:03 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:42 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 15:06 on 02 Sep 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52