Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2004/09/02]

From: Perrin Harkins
Subject: Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Date: 15:06 on 02 Sep 2004
Peter Pimley wrote:
> Yes, I effectively wrote my own has_many that returns a single object 
> rather than a list.

That's actually the definition of might_have, with some optional stuff 
for making it look like it's part of the same object.

- Perrin

(message missing)

Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Peter Pimley 10:02 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:09 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 15:32 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:33 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 17:03 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 16:42 on 01 Sep 2004

Re: Deleting an object on the other side of a has_a
Perrin Harkins 15:06 on 02 Sep 2004

Generated at 11:34 on 01 Dec 2004 by mariachi v0.52