RE: SER1 carb
[prev]
[thread]
[next]
[Date index for 2005/05/06]
Hi Guys
Is an adaptor plate needed to mount the 34ICH on the 2Ltr? The reason
I ask is because I have a 34ICH on my 2.25 SII and I remember I tried
the Solex from the 2.25 on my 2.0 and it wouldn't fit, the mounting
holes in the base were too far apart. I know I didn't check the 34ICH
before I mounted it to the 2.25 because it came with the adaptor plate
to rotate the carb on the intake to allow the throttle linkage to attach
to the carb (which I thought was the only reason for the adaptor).
Thanks
Keith
1953 SI 80"
1961 SII 88"
-----Original Message-----
From: series1-host@xxxxxxxxx.xxx [mailto:series1-host@xxxxxxxxx.xxx] On
Behalf Of GRAHAM WOOD
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 5:16 AM
To: series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: SER1 carb
Hi Ian,
On mine it's a 34ICH which was supplied as a Weber conversion for a
2.25L
Landrover. They're fairly readily available from LR aftermarket parts
people in the UK. It's an easy 'bolt on' fit with just a bit of
tweaking of
the throttle lever needed to get it all correctly lined up with the full
range of movement. Peter Vollers in Woodstock has recently brought and
fitted one so perhaps he can advise on sourcing the correct one in the
States?
When I brought it I was advised to leave the jetting unchanged and my
experience (and others that I know) is that it seems to suit the 2.0L
very
well as supplied for the 2.25. The plugs look good and the vehicle
behaves
strongly and smoothly across the rev range with no flat spots etc at
all.
Interestingly I've heard of people fitting them to 2.25's and being very
unhappy with them to the extent of changing back to a Zenith; so perhaps
it
suits the 2.0 better than the engine it's intended for.
Good luck,
Graham W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ian Balcom" <ian.balcom@xxxxx.xxx>
To: <series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 5:26 AM
Subject: Re: SER1 carb
> Is it the 34ICH or 34ICT?
>
> http://www.webercarbsdirect.com/carburetors
> Does the webber need rejetting for land rover application? I don't
> want valve troubles..
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
> On 5/5/05, Ian Balcom <ian.balcom@xxxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > What model webber for the 2.0L? Does it need an adapter to sit on
the
> > intake manifold properly?
> > Ian
> > SoCal
> >
> > On 5/5/05, Ben Pooley <bpooley@xxxx.xxx> wrote:
> > > So Weber seems to be a popular choice. I would like to replace my
Solex,
> > > especially if the change involves no irreversible mods. What
model
Weber
> > > for a 1950 1595cc engine?
> > > Ben Pooley
> > > Lockeport, Nova Scotia
> > >
> > > At 06:52 PM 5/5/2005, Graham Wood wrote:
> > > >I'm another Weber fan!
> > > >My S1 in everyday use runs far more sweetly in every respect on a
Weber
> > >
> > > To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Ian N. Balcom
> > PhD Student
> > Environmental Toxicology Department
> > University of California
> > Riverside CA 92521
> > 909.380.2176
> >
>
>
> --
> Ian N. Balcom
> PhD Student
> Environmental Toxicology Department
> University of California
> Riverside CA 92521
> 909.380.2176
>
>
> To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
>
>
To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.5 - Release Date: 5/4/2005
To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
 |
(message missing)
|