Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/08]

From: Tom Wykes
Subject: Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Date: 14:12 on 08 Apr 2005
I like that Toyota a lot. it really looks like an evolution from the very 
early ones, especially the front end.
I got a good look at the LR3 the other day and at first sight I didn't like 
it, but having studied it I like it's simplistic block shape. Which is 
after all what all the old Land Rovers were like. But I think what spoils 
it is that it's too fussy, not simple enough.

If someone gave me enough money to afford one, I'd probably buy a top spec. 
110 SW and bank the rest.



At 15:01 08/04/2005, you wrote:
>Mark-
>
>Our local Rover club has been tossing around the opinions about how the new
>LR3 looks.  There is an very definitive split amongst us.  Some love it,
>many hate it.  Some people even drew comparisons of the LR3 to the Honda
>Element....plastic, lack luster toy boxes that aren't very confidence
>inspiring.  It is a trend we'll be seeing more of.  Take a look at the new
>Toyota SWB FJ series:
>http://www.automobilemag.com/auto_shows/2005_chicago/0502_toyota_fj_cruiser/
>
>The horror.  Looks like a play mobile inspired vehicle.   I make fun of it
>now, but I had a nightmare last night that I fell in love with a new one.  I
>woke in cold sweats.
>
>Matt
>______________________________
>Matthew J. Clark
>Seattle, Washington, US of A
>206.932.4610
>107 Station Wagon
>SWB Classic Range Rover
>TDI 110 Station Wagon
>
>
>On 4/8/05 12:47 AM, "Mark Strangways" <mark.strangways@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
>wrote:
>
> >
> > Sorry this is off topic, but I am glad to see that I am not the only
> > one who does not like the look of LR3 or Discovery3 as it is here in the
> > UK. I think it is a pig ugly vehicle and the worst looking of the whole
> > Land Rover product line up. The whole thing reminds me of the kids story
> > about the Kings new clothes - where he was really naked and nobody would
> > dare to critise his appearance. Thats what its like with LR3, no one
> > seems to dare to comment on how it looks over here in the UK - and maybe
> > elsewhere?
> >
> > Anyway, its no where near as pretty as a Series One!
> >
> > Cheers
> > Mark
> > Halifax UK
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
> >
> >
>
>
>To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail


Regards.

Tom Wykes.



PCB Designer
Cambridge Broadband.
Tel.+44 (0)1223 703000
Fax.+44 (0)1223 703001
DDI. +44 (0)1223 703044
tw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx
www.cambridgebroadband.com

If you don't live life on the edge, you're taking up too much space.


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 07:47 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Tom Wykes 14:12 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 22:25 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 08:25 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 23:22 on 10 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 18:21 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 19:54 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 22:45 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 10:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Bob Phillips 17:28 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Mark Strangways 18:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?AW:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Ulrico Becker 21:10 on 15 Apr 2005

Generated at 12:50 on 16 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52