LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/08]

From: Mark Strangways
Subject: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Date: 07:47 on 08 Apr 2005

Sorry this is off topic, but I am glad to see that I am not the only
one who does not like the look of LR3 or Discovery3 as it is here in the
UK. I think it is a pig ugly vehicle and the worst looking of the whole
Land Rover product line up. The whole thing reminds me of the kids story
about the Kings new clothes - where he was really naked and nobody would
dare to critise his appearance. Thats what its like with LR3, no one
seems to dare to comment on how it looks over here in the UK - and maybe
elsewhere?

Anyway, its no where near as pretty as a Series One! 

Cheers
Mark
Halifax UK




To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 07:47 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Matthew J. Clark 14:01 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Tom Wykes 14:12 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Allan Harding 00:33 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 22:25 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 23:59 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
MARTIN 07:45 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 14:22 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 08:25 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 23:22 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 00:41 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 18:21 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 19:22 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 19:54 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 22:45 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 03:42 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
MARTIN 09:33 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 10:24 on 12 Apr 2005

SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?R29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=
Brett Pritt 16:13 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Bob Phillips 17:28 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Mark Strangways 18:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_T�V_!!!?=
Tom Wykes 08:19 on 13 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?AW:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Ulrico Becker 21:10 on 15 Apr 2005

SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?UkU6IFNFUjEgR29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=
Brett Pritt 21:18 on 12 Apr 2005