Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/09]

From: Allan Harding
Subject: Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Date: 00:33 on 09 Apr 2005
    I just read the blurb on the Toyota (can we use that word on this 
list?) Pure, simple and functional? Add as ugly as a hat full of 
a********s. How can plastic and microprocessors be pure simple and 
functional? Same goes for the Discovery 3, 27 microprocessors. Might be 
OK if you live in the UK or Europe where it is only ever a 30 minute 
walk to help when you are out using the vehicle for what it is 
supposedly made for and one of the microprocessors has just drowned or 
cooked.. The MR Mercedes does not even have a spare, just a can of 
Finileak. Really useful when you have just cut the sidewall out of a 
tyre on a mulga root and its 500 Km. to anywhere.
    Pure simple and functioanal is long lost. I will be sticking to my 
Discovery Series I for as long as is humanly possible. It is still 
repairable and can be serviced without a shed full of diagnostic 
computers and a Phd. in astrophysics.
    Cheers, long may both types of Series I Land Rovers soldier on,
    Allan
    Canberra, Australia


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 07:47 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Allan Harding 00:33 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 22:25 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 08:25 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 23:22 on 10 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 18:21 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 19:54 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 22:45 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 10:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Bob Phillips 17:28 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Mark Strangways 18:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?AW:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Ulrico Becker 21:10 on 15 Apr 2005

Generated at 12:50 on 16 Apr 2005 by mariachi v0.52