SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?R29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/04/12]

From: Brett Pritt
Subject: SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?R29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=
Date: 16:13 on 12 Apr 2005

<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV class=RTE>
<P>Hi GANG,</P>
<P>I have my TÜV and the status as an historic vehicle! Next week, I will get my registration and then one morer S1 is on the road again !<IMG height=19 src="http://graphics.hotmail.com/i.p.emsmiled.gif"; width=19></P>
<P>Greetings from Germany and a special "Thank You" to everybody who helped me with logistic and advice, especially: Tom Wykes, Mark Strangways and Tempo-Dirk.</P>
<P>Uli<BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>Ihr persönlicher Türsteher! MSN Hotmail mit Junk-Mail-Filter. <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMBDEDE/2737??PS=47575"; target="_top">Jetzt kostenlos anmelden und aktivieren!</a> Der zeigt ungebetenen E-Mails, wo’s langgeht.</html>


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 07:47 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Matthew J. Clark 14:01 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Tom Wykes 14:12 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Allan Harding 00:33 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 22:25 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 23:59 on 09 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
MARTIN 07:45 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 2.0L engine Part needed (gaskets source)
Mark Strangways 14:22 on 08 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 08:25 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 23:22 on 10 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 00:41 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 18:21 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 19:22 on 11 Apr 2005

RE: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Tom Tollefson 19:54 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Allan Harding 22:45 on 11 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Diana Alan 03:42 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
MARTIN 09:33 on 12 Apr 2005

Re: LR3 was SER1 where have we gone in 60 years?
Bruce Stewart 10:24 on 12 Apr 2005

SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?R29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=
Brett Pritt 16:13 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Bob Phillips 17:28 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Mark Strangways 18:24 on 12 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_SER1_Good_news_!_TÜV_!!!?=
Tom Wykes 08:19 on 13 Apr 2005

=?iso-8859-1?Q?AW:_SER1_Good_news_!_T=DCV_!!!?=
Ulrico Becker 21:10 on 15 Apr 2005

SER1 =?iso-8859-1?B?UkU6IFNFUjEgR29vZCBuZXdzICEgVNxWICEhIQ==?=
Brett Pritt 21:18 on 12 Apr 2005