Re: SER1 86" rear lights

[prev] [thread] [next] [Date index for 2005/09/25]

From: Tony Gammage
Subject: Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Date: 00:16 on 25 Sep 2005
Diana
My 57 109 is one of these CKD cars and sports a Pressed Metal
Corporation tag on the fire wall    109 380.
I sent to the UK for one of those Factory records supplying the chassis
number .
It came back CKD and the date was Jan 57 , no engine number recorded ,
destination Faulls, the local agent in Perth.So now was the car
assembled in the eastern states and shipped here or sent here direct ?
I suppose what I mean is how would the factory know where the car was
going if it came as a set of parts in a shipment? 

Cheers Tony


>>> eightyinch@xxx.xxx.xx 09/24/05 9:04 PM >>>
Wayne

While I want to move on from this topic, I suspect it is even worse for
CKD
assembled vehicles.  Often the boxes would arrive at the final assembler
in
batches of 30 + vehicles at a time.  It is also probable subsequent
shipping's would arrive before current vehicles were assembled.  With
this
situation it is likely that the mechanics would occasionally open the
particular component boxes out of sequence particularly if the first
crate
was placed against a wall and subsequent deliveries in front of it.
Remember there may 6 of the same major component, chassis, engine,
bodies
etc. in each shipping crate.

The variation in quality was such a dogs breakfast across Australia,
that
Rover had to move all it's Australian Land Rover assembly to the bus
builder, Pressed Metal Corporation in Sydney before the end of Series 1
production.

Regards
Diana
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Wayne Perrin" <wperrin@xxxxxxx.xxx>
To: <series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: SER1 86" rear lights


Diana is right on about these production variations. There are plenty
of minor variations that took place depending on the year and even
based on the intended market for export.  I had great difficulty
replacing my distributor cap because it's the early high hat design
which wasn't "supposed to be used" on '53 trucks and parts numbers
didn't match the listings.  We do ourselves a disservice if we
agonize over this as the factory was never the least bit concerned
over what they hung on the engines or  wired into the lighting.  This
is all a recent phenomenon that has grown up around the classic car
industry that makes much of selling the "correct decals" , "correct
this and correct that"    These are glorified farm tractors at the
most utilitarian level.  We put a lot of effort into resuscitating
them and enjoying their quirks but they are never going to appear at
Pebble Beach and never going to be featured at a Barret's megabuck
auction.

Happy Rovering
Wayne Perrin
On Sep 20, 2005, at 9:59 PM, Eighty Inch wrote:

> Allan
>
> I don't want to publicly flog James Taylor, but would like to flog
> Bay View
> Books for the restoration manual going out of print.  After trying
> for a
> year with numerous false buys, including money changing hands, it
> is only in
> the last week that I have been offered one.  I just wanted to point
> out that
> it was James and not Tom Taylor and that James is not, as are none
> of us,
> the "infallible one".
>
> While I like S1's to be original we all understand that some of the
> original
> parts are out of our budgets so some personalising of the vehicles
> must be
> acceptable.  Just like every new owner personalised the vehicle
> from the day
> it left the dealership.  Even ones that came off the assembly line had
> individual differences, some as part of orders others for design
> reasons.
> It is also why some vehicles are restored to manufacturers specs
> and others
> restored to functional "as is" specs.  I know you understand that,
> having at
> least one in each category.
>
> Cheers
> Diana
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Allan Harding" <Allan.Harding@xxx.xxx.xx>
> To: <series1@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 9:14 AM
> Subject: Re: SER1 86" rear lights
>
>
>     Keep going guys,
>     Hot rod all the Series Is you can get your hands on. Go for broke,
> Keith Black engines, Rangie transmissions coil springs disk brakes
> etc.
> Just don't come to me to get approval for historic registration.  In
> time those of us with vehicles which are as near as practically
> original
> or are set up with true period equipment will be smiling.
>     Regarding the comments on James Taylor, while there are
> acknowledged
> errors in the text of his book, it is the most definitive book
> published
> on the topic to date and worth owning. There is no need to publicly
> flog
> the guy. Some of the comments over the last couple of days are
> bordering
> on libellous.
>     The colour thing may well be true for British home market 80"
> vehicles but they were offered in other colours in other markets and
> were possibly supplied to fleet owners in their choice of colour.
>     It is also worth noting that some of the vehicle numbers quoted
> for
> the change of a particular part (most often the propriety parts from
> outside suppliers like Lucas or Girling etc.) are not definitive.
> Sometimes new parts were late arriving and the stock of superseded
> parts
> reserved as spares stock was raided to keep production going. The
> result
> is that the definitive statement that such and such a part superseded
> this one at a given vehicle number may not be totally correct in
> all cases.
>     Cheers
>     Allan
>     Canberra, Australia
>
>
> To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
>
>
>
>
> To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail
>

To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail




To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail





----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
          
This email and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged in 
which case neither is intended to be waived. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify us and delete the e-mail and all copies. 
Macmahon does not guarantee that this e-mail is virus or error free. The 
attached files are provided and may only be used on the basis that the user 
assumes all responsibility for any loss, damage or consequence resulting 
directly or indirectly from the use of the attached files, whether caused by 
the negligence of the sender or not. Macmahon is not responsible for any 
changes made to a document other than those made by Macmahon, or for the 
effect of any changes (not made by Macmahon) on a document's meaning. 
Macmahon is not responsible for the content and opinions in non-business 
related e-mail.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


To change subscription see www.landrover.net/series1/mail

(message missing)

SER1 86" rear lights
Tony Boyle 18:24 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
azwriter 18:45 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Brett Pritt 21:01 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
William Ross 21:50 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Bob and Sue Bernard 21:58 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 23:18 on 18 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Nick Condon 23:38 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Bob and Sue Bernard 23:39 on 18 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
William Ross 16:05 on 20 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Tom Wykes 16:17 on 20 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
William Ross 16:46 on 20 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Jeremy Brooks 17:31 on 20 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Bob and Sue Bernard 23:57 on 18 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Lyndon Wortley 08:59 on 19 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Mark Strangways 09:20 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
MARK LOVE 11:19 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
06:55 on 21 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
MARTIN 07:43 on 21 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Tony Gammage 00:16 on 25 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 01:09 on 25 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 00:43 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Bob and Sue Bernard 01:07 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 01:43 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Allan Harding 23:14 on 19 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 01:59 on 21 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Wayne Perrin 12:36 on 24 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 13:04 on 24 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Alyn Fendley 18:21 on 20 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Jeremy Brooks 18:57 on 20 Sep 2005

RE: SER1 86" rear lights
Jeremy Brooks 19:03 on 20 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
Eighty Inch 00:41 on 21 Sep 2005

Re: SER1 86" rear lights
MARTIN 07:33 on 21 Sep 2005

Generated at 17:56 on 28 Sep 2005 by mariachi v0.52